Syntax
(the system of
rules in operation in computer systems and other systems)
A
man, staring at his equations, said , that the Universe had a
beginning. There had
been an explosion, he said. A Bang of Bangs ("Big Bang"), and the
Universe was born. And it is
expanding, he said. He had even calculated the length of its life: ten
billion revolutions of the
Earth around the Sun. The entire Globe cheered; they found his
calculations to be science. None
thought, that by proposing, that the Universe began, the man had merely
mirrored the syntax (system
of rules in operation) of his mother tongue; a syntax, which demands
beginnings, like birth, and
developments like maturation, and ends, like death, as statement of
facts. The Universe began and IT'S GETTING OLD, the man assured
us, and it
will die, like all things die,
like he himself died after confirming mathematically the syntax of his
mother
tongue.
The
Other Syntax
Did
the Universe really begin? Is the theory of the 'Big Bang' true? These
are not
questions, though they sound like they are. Is the syntax, that
requires beginnings, developments
and ends as statements of fact, the only syntax, that exist? That's the
real question. There are
other syntaxes. There is one,
for example, which demands, that
varieties of Intensity be taken as
facts. In that syntax nothing begins and nothing ends; thus birth is
not a clean,
clear-cut event, but a specific type of Intensity, and so is
maturation, and so is
death. A Human of that syntax, looking over
his equations, finds, that he
has calculated enough
varieties of Intensity to say with authority, that the Universe never
began and will never end, but
that it has gone, and is going now, and will go through endless
fluctuations of Intensity.
That man
could very well conclude, that the Universe itself is the chariot of
Intensity and, that one can
board it to journey through changes without end. He will conclude all
that, and much more, perhaps
without ever realizing, that he merely conforming the syntax of his
mother
tongue.